06 / 60 · Product Systems

News Feed — Production Architecture

All designs

Generate ranked, paginated feeds while absorbing celebrity fan-out.

500M users · 100K feed reads/s · 20K posts/s
1. High-level architecture and animated call flow

Choose a path, then play or step through exactly how the call moves between components.

← / → step · Space play
CLOUD / MULTI-AZ DEPLOYMENT NEWS FEED · PRODUCTION TOPOLOGY 14 named components · solid = request/data dependency · warm curve = control, event, or repair path MULTI-ZONE · VERSIONED · REPLAYABLE 01 · REQUEST & CONTROL02 · DOMAIN & COORDINATION03 · DATA, ASYNC & OPERATIONSrequestauthenticateroutevalidateread / reservecommitpublishconsumeprojectobserverepairreconcileinvalidatepolicy snapshotevent streamtelemetry 01 EXTERNAL Mobile Client interaction boundary 02 SERVICE Feed API protocol · auth · quota 03 SECURITY Auth/Policy decision & coordination 04 SERVICE Candidate Service domain subsystem 05 SERVICE Social Graph domain subsystem 06 DATA Post Store authoritative durable state 07 EDGE Fanout Router asynchronous execution 08 SERVICE Timeline Workers asynchronous execution 09 SERVICE Timeline Cache low-latency read path 10 SERVICE Celebrity Pull Path domain subsystem 11 SERVICE Ranking Service domain subsystem 12 DATA Feature Store authoritative durable state 13 SERVICE Ads Mixer domain subsystem 14 STREAM Impression Stream durable ordered events externaledgeservicedatastreamsecurityops
Step 1 / 7Mobile Client

The caller starts the operation at Mobile Client with a stable request and retry identity.

  1. 01 · Mobile ClientThe caller starts the operation at Mobile Client with a stable request and retry identity.
  2. 02 · Feed APICommit the post and emit one immutable post-created event.
  3. 03 · Candidate ServiceFan out ordinary authors into follower timeline partitions; mark celebrities pull-on-read.
  4. 04 · Auth / PolicyAt read, merge materialized timeline, celebrity candidates, and eligible ads.
  5. 05 · Fanout RouterFilter privacy/deletes, fetch features, rank a bounded candidate set, and paginate by cursor.
  6. 06 · Post StoreLog impressions asynchronously with model and candidate-set versions.
  7. 07 · Impression StreamImpression Stream durably records side effects so workers can replay them independently.
2. Critical request and recovery sequence
MUTATION / COMMITMobile ClientACTOR 01Feed APIACTOR 02CandidateServiceACTOR 03TimelineWorkersACTOR 04ONLINE / READ + RECOVERYMobile ClientACTOR 01Auth/PolicyACTOR 02Post StoreACTOR 03ImpressionStreamACTOR 04Commit the post and emit one / immutable post-created event.Fan out ordinary authors into / follower timeline partitions; markAt read, merge materialized / timeline, celebrity candidates, andcommitted result + eventAt read, merge materialized / timeline, celebrity candidates, andFilter privacy/deletes, fetch / features, rank a bounded candidateLog impressions asynchronously with / model and candidate-set versions.cached/read result + cursortimeout → retry same identity → read committed truth → reconcile

Mobile Client

  • Owns client protocol, request identity, retry, and resume behavior.
  • Stateless or lease-scoped; durable progress lives elsewhere.

Feed API

  • Owns authentication, validation, quotas, deadlines, and routing.
  • Stateless or lease-scoped; durable progress lives elsewhere.

Auth / Policy

  • Owns one bounded domain decision, transition, or operational capability.
  • Partitioned by aggregate/key and guarded by version, uniqueness, or fencing.

Candidate Service

  • Owns one bounded domain decision, transition, or operational capability.
  • Partitioned by aggregate/key and guarded by version, uniqueness, or fencing.

Complete System Design Tutorial

The design separates the latency-sensitive online path, the correctness-critical durable transition, and asynchronous projection or repair work. Each chapter below explains one decision shown in the diagrams.

1. Requirements and scope

Functional requirements

  • Execute the primary news feed workflow and return an observable result.
  • Expose the concrete operations shown below with stable retry identities.
  • Allow operators to inspect, disable, repair, or replay ambiguous state.
  • Keep derived analytics and notifications off the correctness-critical path.

Non-functional requirements

  • Design for 500M users · 100K feed reads/s · 20K posts/s.
  • Protect the named business invariant under concurrency and partial failure.
  • Scale by an explicit aggregate/partition key without one global mutex.
  • Degrade intentionally when cache, queue, store, or regional ownership is unavailable.
Primary invariant: each accepted news feed operation has one stable result and retries do not repeat its business effect.
↑ top

2. Capacity assumptions

State assumptions before choosing technology. The supplied workload is 500M users · 100K feed reads/s · 20K posts/s. Convert it into peak throughput, retained records, bandwidth, and failure budget; then connect each number to a component.

DimensionWorking estimateDesign implication
Traffic500M users · 100K feed reads/s · 20K posts/sSeparate online compute, durable state, and asynchronous consumers.
Peak factor5–10× averageAdmission control, autoscaling headroom, and hot-key protection.
Stored statewrite rate × retention × record bytesPartition count, indexes, compaction, backup, and archival tier.
Networkpeak operations × payload sizeBatching, compression, edge placement, and egress budget.
Availability99.9–99.99%Multi-zone replicas, tested failover, and dependency error budgets.
RecoveryRPO/RTO by invariantAck boundary, replay retention, reconciliation, and operator runbooks.
Do not cargo-cult the numbers: show the arithmetic, name the uncertain variable, and say which production metric will replace the interview estimate.
↑ top

3. API and data model

POST /v1/postscommit source post
GET /v1/feed?cursor=ranked page
DELETE /v1/posts/{id}tombstone and invalidate
POST /v1/impressionsbatched exposure events

Authoritative records and indexes

post(post_id PK, author_id, body_ref, visibility, created_at)

timeline(user_id, rank_key, post_id, source, inserted_at)

follow(follower_id, followee_id, state)

cursor(snapshot_time, rank_key, post_id)

Command and event envelopes

# Command envelope
operation: POST /v1/posts
request_id: req_01J...
idempotency_key: idem_7f2...
aggregate_key: news-feed_123
expected_version: 17
payload: {...}

# Durable event
event_id: evt_01J...
aggregate_key: news-feed_123
event_type: news_feed_committed
schema_version: 3
trace_id: tr_8ac...

The authoritative aggregate and idempotency record share a transactional or conditional-write boundary. Event streams, search indexes, caches, analytics, and dashboards are rebuildable projections.

↑ top

4. Why this architecture and what it costs

The boxes are not a shopping list. Each boundary exists because it owns a different invariant, scaling dimension, data lifecycle, security policy, or failure domain. The table makes those choices explicit and shows when the design should remain simpler.

ComponentOwned responsibilityWhy separate itRejected alternativeCost and evolution trigger
Mobile ClientOwns client protocol, request identity, retry, and resume behavior. In this design it participates in: Commit the post and emit one immutable post-created event.Separates a distinct scale, ownership, policy, or failure boundary. It prevents the external caller from also owning the contract and failure behavior of Feed API.Keep this behavior inside an adjacent service. Prefer that simpler option until independent scale, ownership, policy, or failure isolation is measurable. Here that simpler choice would couple “Celebrity post creates billion-edge fan-out” to the external caller.Costs an interface, deployment, telemetry, ownership, and failure mode. Keep it in-process first; extract when independent scale or reliability pays for the boundary. Measure the latency, saturation, lag, or mismatch at the Mobile Client boundary before extracting or scaling it.
Feed APIOwns authentication, validation, quotas, deadlines, and routing. In this design it participates in: Fan out ordinary authors into follower timeline partitions; mark celebrities pull-on-read.Separates a distinct scale, ownership, policy, or failure boundary. It prevents Mobile Client from also owning the contract and failure behavior of Auth / Policy.Put protocol, authentication, quotas, and business transitions in one process. Acceptable at low scale, but it couples external traffic risk to domain releases. Here that simpler choice would couple “Feed cursor sees inserts between pages” to Mobile Client.Costs another hop, policy distribution, and a high-blast-radius fleet. Introduce it when many clients or services need one protocol and protection boundary. Measure the latency, saturation, lag, or mismatch at the Feed API boundary before extracting or scaling it.
Auth / PolicyOwns one bounded domain decision, transition, or operational capability. In this design it participates in: At read, merge materialized timeline, celebrity candidates, and eligible ads.Separates a distinct scale, ownership, policy, or failure boundary. It prevents Feed API from also owning the contract and failure behavior of Candidate Service.Embed policy in every caller. Rules then drift by deployment version and emergency changes require fleet-wide redeployment. Here that simpler choice would couple “Deleted private post remains cached” to Feed API.Costs an interface, deployment, telemetry, ownership, and failure mode. Keep it in-process first; extract when independent scale or reliability pays for the boundary. Measure the latency, saturation, lag, or mismatch at the Auth / Policy boundary before extracting or scaling it.
Candidate ServiceOwns one bounded domain decision, transition, or operational capability. In this design it participates in: Filter privacy/deletes, fetch features, rank a bounded candidate set, and paginate by cursor.Separates a distinct scale, ownership, policy, or failure boundary. It prevents Auth / Policy from also owning the contract and failure behavior of Social Graph.Keep this behavior inside an adjacent service. Prefer that simpler option until independent scale, ownership, policy, or failure isolation is measurable. Here that simpler choice would couple “Ranking service exceeds latency budget” to Auth / Policy.Costs an interface, deployment, telemetry, ownership, and failure mode. Keep it in-process first; extract when independent scale or reliability pays for the boundary. Measure the latency, saturation, lag, or mismatch at the Candidate Service boundary before extracting or scaling it.
Social GraphOwns one bounded domain decision, transition, or operational capability. In this design it participates in: Log impressions asynchronously with model and candidate-set versions.Separates a distinct scale, ownership, policy, or failure boundary. It prevents Candidate Service from also owning the contract and failure behavior of Post Store.Keep this behavior inside an adjacent service. Prefer that simpler option until independent scale, ownership, policy, or failure isolation is measurable. Here that simpler choice would couple “Fanout lag causes stale timelines” to Candidate Service.Costs an interface, deployment, telemetry, ownership, and failure mode. Keep it in-process first; extract when independent scale or reliability pays for the boundary. Measure the latency, saturation, lag, or mismatch at the Social Graph boundary before extracting or scaling it.
Post StoreOwns authoritative versioned state or immutable evidence. In this design it participates in: Commit the post and emit one immutable post-created event.Defines the source of truth and commit boundary. It prevents Social Graph from also owning the contract and failure behavior of Fanout Router.Let each service persist its own interpretation. That removes one clear commit boundary and makes retries, support, and reconciliation ambiguous. Here that simpler choice would couple “Celebrity post creates billion-edge fan-out” to Social Graph.Costs schema migration, replication, backup, and shard ownership. Split storage only when access patterns, retention, or compliance boundaries materially differ. Measure the latency, saturation, lag, or mismatch at the Post Store boundary before extracting or scaling it.
Fanout RouterExecutes idempotent asynchronous work under lease and retry policy. In this design it participates in: Fan out ordinary authors into follower timeline partitions; mark celebrities pull-on-read.Separates a distinct scale, ownership, policy, or failure boundary. It prevents Post Store from also owning the contract and failure behavior of Timeline Workers.Perform the work before acknowledging the caller. This gives simpler consistency but unbounded tail latency and fragile retries. Here that simpler choice would couple “Feed cursor sees inserts between pages” to Post Store.Costs leases, checkpoints, retries, DLQs, and lag operations. Separate once execution time or burstiness no longer fits the request deadline. Measure the latency, saturation, lag, or mismatch at the Fanout Router boundary before extracting or scaling it.
Timeline WorkersExecutes idempotent asynchronous work under lease and retry policy. In this design it participates in: At read, merge materialized timeline, celebrity candidates, and eligible ads.Separates a distinct scale, ownership, policy, or failure boundary. It prevents Fanout Router from also owning the contract and failure behavior of Timeline Cache.Perform the work before acknowledging the caller. This gives simpler consistency but unbounded tail latency and fragile retries. Here that simpler choice would couple “Deleted private post remains cached” to Fanout Router.Costs leases, checkpoints, retries, DLQs, and lag operations. Separate once execution time or burstiness no longer fits the request deadline. Measure the latency, saturation, lag, or mismatch at the Timeline Workers boundary before extracting or scaling it.
Timeline CacheServes a low-latency, disposable projection with authoritative fallback. In this design it participates in: Filter privacy/deletes, fetch features, rank a bounded candidate set, and paginate by cursor.Removes repeated work from the latency-critical path. It prevents Timeline Workers from also owning the contract and failure behavior of Celebrity Pull Path.Read authoritative storage for every request. Simpler initially, but latency and source-of-truth load scale together and a hot key becomes a database incident. Here that simpler choice would couple “Ranking service exceeds latency budget” to Timeline Workers.Costs invalidation, staleness, stampede protection, and memory. Add or split it only after the workload (500M users · 100K feed reads/s · 20K posts/s) proves repeated reads dominate. Measure the latency, saturation, lag, or mismatch at the Timeline Cache boundary before extracting or scaling it.
Celebrity Pull PathOwns one bounded domain decision, transition, or operational capability. In this design it participates in: Log impressions asynchronously with model and candidate-set versions.Separates a distinct scale, ownership, policy, or failure boundary. It prevents Timeline Cache from also owning the contract and failure behavior of Ranking Service.Keep this behavior inside an adjacent service. Prefer that simpler option until independent scale, ownership, policy, or failure isolation is measurable. Here that simpler choice would couple “Fanout lag causes stale timelines” to Timeline Cache.Costs an interface, deployment, telemetry, ownership, and failure mode. Keep it in-process first; extract when independent scale or reliability pays for the boundary. Measure the latency, saturation, lag, or mismatch at the Celebrity Pull Path boundary before extracting or scaling it.
Ranking ServiceOwns one bounded domain decision, transition, or operational capability. In this design it participates in: Commit the post and emit one immutable post-created event.Separates a distinct scale, ownership, policy, or failure boundary. It prevents Celebrity Pull Path from also owning the contract and failure behavior of Feature Store.Keep this behavior inside an adjacent service. Prefer that simpler option until independent scale, ownership, policy, or failure isolation is measurable. Here that simpler choice would couple “Celebrity post creates billion-edge fan-out” to Celebrity Pull Path.Costs an interface, deployment, telemetry, ownership, and failure mode. Keep it in-process first; extract when independent scale or reliability pays for the boundary. Measure the latency, saturation, lag, or mismatch at the Ranking Service boundary before extracting or scaling it.
Feature StoreOwns authoritative versioned state or immutable evidence. In this design it participates in: Fan out ordinary authors into follower timeline partitions; mark celebrities pull-on-read.Defines the source of truth and commit boundary. It prevents Ranking Service from also owning the contract and failure behavior of Ads Mixer.Let each service persist its own interpretation. That removes one clear commit boundary and makes retries, support, and reconciliation ambiguous. Here that simpler choice would couple “Feed cursor sees inserts between pages” to Ranking Service.Costs schema migration, replication, backup, and shard ownership. Split storage only when access patterns, retention, or compliance boundaries materially differ. Measure the latency, saturation, lag, or mismatch at the Feature Store boundary before extracting or scaling it.
Ads MixerOwns one bounded domain decision, transition, or operational capability. In this design it participates in: At read, merge materialized timeline, celebrity candidates, and eligible ads.Separates a distinct scale, ownership, policy, or failure boundary. It prevents Feature Store from also owning the contract and failure behavior of Impression Stream.Keep this behavior inside an adjacent service. Prefer that simpler option until independent scale, ownership, policy, or failure isolation is measurable. Here that simpler choice would couple “Deleted private post remains cached” to Feature Store.Costs an interface, deployment, telemetry, ownership, and failure mode. Keep it in-process first; extract when independent scale or reliability pays for the boundary. Measure the latency, saturation, lag, or mismatch at the Ads Mixer boundary before extracting or scaling it.
Impression StreamPreserves durable ordering, replay, and consumer checkpoints. In this design it participates in: Filter privacy/deletes, fetch features, rank a bounded candidate set, and paginate by cursor.Decouples bursts and failure from user acknowledgment. It prevents Ads Mixer from also owning the contract and failure behavior of operators and repair tooling.Call every downstream consumer synchronously. That couples user latency and availability to analytics, notification, indexing, and audit dependencies. Here that simpler choice would couple “Ranking service exceeds latency budget” to Ads Mixer.Costs eventual consistency, schema evolution, replay tooling, idempotent consumers, and lag operations. Earn it when bursts or downstream failure must not block acknowledgment. Measure the latency, saturation, lag, or mismatch at the Impression Stream boundary before extracting or scaling it.
Decision 01

Chosen boundary vs simpler monolith

Use fan-out-on-write for ordinary authors and fan-out-on-read for celebrities.

A single deployable with one transactional store is the right starting point for a small news feed workload. The proposed boundary becomes justified when use fan-out-on-write for ordinary authors and fan-out-on-read for celebrities. Separating it contains the named failure “Celebrity post creates billion-edge fan-out” without placing unrelated work on the critical path.

Decision 02

Correctness vs availability

Store stable cursor tokens rather than offsets; rank candidates after filtering and policy checks.

The design coordinates only where each accepted news feed operation has one stable result and retries do not repeat its business effect. Everywhere else it accepts bounded staleness or asynchronous propagation. The alternative—strong coordination for every projection—simplifies the mental model but increases tail latency and turns partitions into broad write unavailability.

Decision 03

Operational cost and evolution

Separate candidate generation from ranking so models can evolve without changing feed storage.

This choice adds dashboards, ownership, schema compatibility, capacity planning, and recovery runbooks. Start with the minimum topology that supports “At read, merge materialized timeline, celebrity candidates, and eligible ads.” and extract another service only when measured throughput, blast radius, data lifecycle, or team ownership changes independently.

Why this design: the synchronous path contains only the decisions required to protect each accepted news feed operation has one stable result and retries do not repeat its business effect. Durable projections, notifications, indexing, analytics, and repair are isolated so their load or failure cannot corrupt the acknowledged operation.
Correctness boundary

Use fan-out-on-write for ordinary authors and fan-out-on-read for celebrities.

Scale boundary

Store stable cursor tokens rather than offsets; rank candidates after filtering and policy checks.

Operational boundary

Separate candidate generation from ranking so models can evolve without changing feed storage.

↑ top

5. Critical flow and algorithm

01

Commit the post and emit one immutable post-created event.

02

Fan out ordinary authors into follower timeline partitions; mark celebrities pull-on-read.

03

At read, merge materialized timeline, celebrity candidates, and eligible ads.

04

Filter privacy/deletes, fetch features, rank a bounded candidate set, and paginate by cursor.

05

Log impressions asynchronously with model and candidate-set versions.

Retry-safe mutation skeleton

identity = authenticate(request)
prior = idempotency.get(identity, request.key)
if prior: return prior.result

current = authoritative_store.read(partition_key)
next_state, events = domain.transition(current, request)
authoritative_store.compare_and_set(current.version, next_state)
idempotency.commit(request.key, next_state.result)
outbox.append(events)
return next_state.result
Exactly-once business effect: the network can duplicate requests. Stable identities, conditional state transitions, immutable event IDs, and reconciliation make the user-visible effect happen once.
↑ top

6. Caching, hot keys, and backpressure

Cache policy

Cache immutable or slowly changing reads with versioned keys, TTL jitter, short negative entries, and request coalescing.

Hot partition or tenant

Measure per-key and per-tenant skew. Replicate safe reads, isolate the offender, salt only when ordering permits, and enforce budgets.

Backpressure

Bound queues, buffers, connection pools, and concurrency. Shed low-priority work and scale from lag/oldest-item age rather than CPU alone.

Stampede and retry storms

Use single-flight/coalescing, jittered expiry, bounded retries, exponential backoff, and circuit breakers so one dependency failure does not multiply traffic.

Cache outage rule: never allow every miss to fall through simultaneously. Use local protection, request coalescing, circuit breakers, bounded pools, and controlled fallback.
↑ top

7. Partitioning and consistency

partition = stable_hash(primary_or_aggregate_key) → shard owner
write = conditional_update(expected_version)
read_projection = versioned and rebuildable

Strong boundary

each accepted news feed operation has one stable result and retries do not repeat its business effect. Use a uniqueness constraint, serializable/conditional write, expected version, or fencing token at this boundary.

Eventual boundary

Analytics, notifications, search, read models, and operational dashboards may lag when freshness is observable and replay exists.

OperationConsistencyReason
Authoritative mutationConditional / serializableProtect uniqueness, ownership, money, inventory, order, or legal state transition.
Read after own writePrimary, session token, or cache warmThe caller must observe the result it just committed.
Ordinary read projectionBounded stale where safeReplicas and caches improve latency when version/freshness is visible.
Analytics and operationsEventual + replayFreshness is less important than isolating the online path.
  • Route every mutation for one aggregate to one owner/partition epoch.
  • Use cursors rather than offsets for changing ordered collections.
  • Retain tombstones until replication and repair windows close.
  • Move shard ownership through versioned maps and dual-read verification.
↑ top

8. Failure drills and recovery

FailureRuntime behaviorRecovery proof
Celebrity post creates billion-edge fan-outStop unsafe progress, serve only explicitly safe degraded behavior, and recover from durable state.Reconciliation returns zero invariant gaps; lag/replica health and user-visible SLO return to baseline.
Feed cursor sees inserts between pagesStop unsafe progress, serve only explicitly safe degraded behavior, and recover from durable state.Reconciliation returns zero invariant gaps; lag/replica health and user-visible SLO return to baseline.
Deleted private post remains cachedStop unsafe progress, serve only explicitly safe degraded behavior, and recover from durable state.Reconciliation returns zero invariant gaps; lag/replica health and user-visible SLO return to baseline.
Ranking service exceeds latency budgetStop unsafe progress, serve only explicitly safe degraded behavior, and recover from durable state.Reconciliation returns zero invariant gaps; lag/replica health and user-visible SLO return to baseline.
Fanout lag causes stale timelinesStop unsafe progress, serve only explicitly safe degraded behavior, and recover from durable state.Reconciliation returns zero invariant gaps; lag/replica health and user-visible SLO return to baseline.

Recovery checkpoint

# Recovery checkpoint
scenario: Celebrity post creates billion-edge fan-out
operation_id: op_01J...
aggregate_key: news-feed_123
last_durable_version: 18
projection_checkpoint: partition-07@offset-482901
retry_policy: same_identity / bounded_backoff
reconciliation_status: pending
owner: Impression Stream

Every dependency needs a timeout, retry budget, circuit policy, and explicit fail-open, fail-closed, stale, or read-only mode. “Highly available” is incomplete until degraded behavior is named.

↑ top

9. Security, regions, and observability

Security and abuse

  • Authenticate at ingress and authorize the exact resource/tenant on every operation.
  • Encrypt transport and durable data; tokenize or isolate sensitive material.
  • Rate-limit by tenant, actor, resource, and network; detect enumeration and anomalous fan-out.
  • Redact secrets and personal data before logs or analytical storage.
  • Audit privileged mutations, support access, policy changes, and forced recovery.

Signals that prove correctness

  • User-visible success rate and p50/p95/p99 latency.
  • Timeouts, circuit state, saturation, and replica health by dependency.
  • Queue lag, oldest-item age, retries, and dead-letter growth.
  • Conflict, duplicate-suppression, and reconciliation mismatch counts.
  • Business drill: Celebrity post creates billion-edge fan-out — alert before the user-visible invariant is violated.

Regional evolution

  1. Begin multi-zone with tested failover, backups, and reconciliation.
  2. Add global stateless ingress and regional read projections.
  3. Keep one write owner per aggregate or partition where coordination is expensive.
  4. Move ownership with epochs/fencing; avoid silent simultaneous writers.
  5. Use expand/contract schemas, canaries, shadow reads, and reversible cutovers.
↑ top

10. Interviewer follow-ups

How do celebrity accounts work?

Use fan-out-on-write for ordinary authors and fan-out-on-read for celebrities. Walk the concrete lifecycle step “Commit the post and emit one immutable post-created event.” Then test it against “Celebrity post creates billion-edge fan-out”. State the retry identity, durable checkpoint, recovery signal, and cost of the alternative.

How do you prevent duplicate posts?

Store stable cursor tokens rather than offsets; rank candidates after filtering and policy checks. Walk the concrete lifecycle step “Fan out ordinary authors into follower timeline partitions; mark celebrities pull-on-read.” Then test it against “Feed cursor sees inserts between pages”. State the retry identity, durable checkpoint, recovery signal, and cost of the alternative.

How do you paginate a changing feed?

Separate candidate generation from ranking so models can evolve without changing feed storage. Walk the concrete lifecycle step “At read, merge materialized timeline, celebrity candidates, and eligible ads.” Then test it against “Deleted private post remains cached”. State the retry identity, durable checkpoint, recovery signal, and cost of the alternative.

How do you insert ads?

Use fan-out-on-write for ordinary authors and fan-out-on-read for celebrities. Walk the concrete lifecycle step “Filter privacy/deletes, fetch features, rank a bounded candidate set, and paginate by cursor.” Then test it against “Ranking service exceeds latency budget”. State the retry identity, durable checkpoint, recovery signal, and cost of the alternative.

How do you retrain ranking models safely?

Store stable cursor tokens rather than offsets; rank candidates after filtering and policy checks. Walk the concrete lifecycle step “Log impressions asynchronously with model and candidate-set versions.” Then test it against “Fanout lag causes stale timelines”. State the retry identity, durable checkpoint, recovery signal, and cost of the alternative.

Answer pattern: state the invariant, choose a mechanism, walk one failure, name the recovery signal, and explain the cost of the alternative.
↑ top

11. How to present this in 45 minutes

TimeWhat to cover
0–5 minClarify scope, workload, SLOs, and the correctness invariant.
5–10 minEstimate throughput/storage and define concrete APIs and records.
10–20 minDraw online, durable-write, and asynchronous/repair paths.
20–30 minExplain the exact lifecycle, partition key, and concurrency control.
30–38 minDiscuss caching, hot keys, replication, and backpressure.
38–43 minRun failure drills, security, observability, and regional evolution.
43–45 minSummarize the five most important choices and trade-offs.

Final decision summary

Invarianteach accepted news feed operation has one stable result and retries do not repeat its business effect.
PartitioningStable aggregate/key hash with versioned ownership and measured hot-key isolation.
CommitExpected version or uniqueness at the authoritative state boundary.
Async workDurable outbox/log, idempotent consumers, checkpoints, and replay.
RecoverySame operation identity, durable truth lookup, and business reconciliation.

Closing summary

CLOSING “The design protects each accepted news feed operation has one stable result and retries do not repeat its business effect. The online path stays bounded, authoritative state is versioned and partitioned, and asynchronous work is replayable and observable.”
↑ top